<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Newsletter Archives &#187; Chemicals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/tag/chemicals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles</link>
	<description>Archives of Jehovah-Jireh Farm Newsletters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Monsanto &#8211; Too Big to Fall?</title>
		<link>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2009/11/19/monsanto-too-big-to-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2009/11/19/monsanto-too-big-to-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Myron Horst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMO's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsanto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2009/11/19/monsanto-too-big-to-fall/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in the Washington DC area you often hear Monsanto running ads on the radio touting how they are helping farmers feed the world and how they are supporting sustainable agriculture. However, Monsanto is anything but a supporter of sustainable agriculture. They are a giant agricultural chemical and genetically modified (GMO) seed corporation that has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><big><small>Here in the Washington DC area you often hear Monsanto running ads on the radio touting how they are helping farmers feed the world and how they are supporting sustainable agriculture. However, Monsanto is anything but a supporter of sustainable agriculture. They are a giant agricultural chemical and genetically modified (GMO) seed corporation that has done much damage to sustainable agriculture. Many people have lamented how Monsanto has been able to &quot;legally&quot; run rough shod over farmers in developing a monopoly in the agricultural world.</small></big></p>
<p><big><small>Last month, a little reported, but very significant event happened. France&#8217;s Supreme Court ruled against Monsanto, saying that the agrochemical giant had not told the truth about its best selling weed-killer, Roundup. Monsanto had falsely advertised Roundup as being &quot;biodegradeable&quot; and claimed that it &quot;left the soil clean&quot;.&#160; Roundup is not biodegradable and it does contaminate the soil.</small></big></p>
<p><big><small>For years we have been told that when Roundup is sprayed it kills plants, but when the chemical comes in contact with the soil it is neutralized. It has been said so often that many believe it to be true. France&#8217;s Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling shows proof that Roundup is not neutralized in the soil. The use of Roundup is one of the leading reasons why Monsanto has developed genetically modified seeds. The plants grown from their genetically modified seeds can be sprayed with Roundup and will not die. That enables farmer to spray their fields with Roundup and kill the weeds after the corn or soybeans have come up and not harm the corn or soybeans.</small></big></p>
<p><big><small>Keep watching. Someday &#8211; maybe in the distant future &#8211; but someday, Monsanto and their Roundup will likely disappear, never to be seen again.&#160; &quot;I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a green bay tree.&#160; Yet he passed away, and, lo, he was not: yea, I sought him, but he could not be found.&quot; (</small></big><big><small>Psalm 37:35-36)</small></big></p>
<p><big><small>Monsanto&#8217;s philosophy is built upon the evolutionary mindset that there is no God and that genetic selection (including genetically modified organisms—GMO’s) is THE answer to improving food production and feeding the world. What is being missed is that while genetic improvement has increased food production, the nutrient density of the food has decreased along with human and animal health. More food has to be consumed to supply the needed nutrients and as a result, obesity is increasing among children. The majority of people and animals today are either on pharmaceutical drugs or natural supplements to try to have some semblance of health. This is a testimony that Monsanto&#8217;s method of genetic selection is not THE answer.</small></big></p>
<p><big><small>God created the soil full of minerals in the Garden of Eden. The soil has been declining ever since. It has been documented that in the last 60 years that the mineral density of the soils has significantly decreased. We need to first rebuild the mineral and organic density of our soil. Then we can select for genetic superiority. The seeds that have been genetically selected by Monsanto to grow in mineral depleted soils do not have the proper genetic expression to grow in nutrient rich soils and produce nutrient dense foods. Many organic farmers and gardeners have discovered this and that is why there is a growing interest in heirloom seeds. The heirloom seeds in improved soils produce higher protein food and nutrient density. Along with the nutrient density is a significantly improved flavor. Our mouths tell us what food is best for our bodies by how good the food tastes.&#160; When a tomato looks like a tomato but acts and tastes more like a tennis ball, you can be sure that that tomato was genetically selected for some other quality than nutrient dense food. </small></big><big><small>Listen to your mouth and eat what is good! If it has a poor taste quality it is poor quality food. That is true of meats and eggs as well.</small></big>    <br /><big><small>       <br />Links to articles on Monsanto        <br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8308903.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8308903.stm</a>        <br /><a href="http://www.midnorthmonitor.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2160916">http://www.midnorthmonitor.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2160916</a>&#160; &#8211; An article showing how the &quot;inactive&quot; ingredients, the trade secret ingredients, that make Roundup more potent have been found to cause human liver cells to die.        <br /><a href="http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/20080627/n1">http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/20080627/n1</a></small></big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2009/11/19/monsanto-too-big-to-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of Organic &#8211; Less Chance of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria</title>
		<link>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/08/06/the-importance-of-organic-less-chance-of-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/08/06/the-importance-of-organic-less-chance-of-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Myron Horst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/08/06/the-importance-of-organic-less-chance-of-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month the Poultry Site web site had an article about research by a team of Johns Hopkins researchers on antibiotic-resistant bacteria found in chicken purchased in Baltimore, MD supermarkets. They purchased chickens in the supermarkets from five different poultry companies for 20 weeks in 2004 and for 15 weeks in 2006. In both 2004 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month the Poultry Site web site had an article about research by a team of Johns Hopkins researchers on antibiotic-resistant bacteria found in chicken purchased in Baltimore, MD supermarkets. They purchased chickens in the supermarkets from five different poultry companies for 20 weeks in 2004 and for 15 weeks in 2006. In both 2004 and 2006 they found that Campylobacter strains of bacteria from conventionally produced chicken were more likely to be resistant to the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics than antibiotic-free chicken. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are used by doctors to treat food poisoning caused by Campylobacter. Poultry producers had been using fluoroquinolones to treat respiratory disease in their chickens but claimed that they had stopped using it in 2002 three years before it was banned by the FDA in 2005. Despite the fluoroquinolone no longer being used to treat the chickens, the proportion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on the conventionally produced chicken showed no significant change between 2004 and 2006 indicating that the amount of antibiotic-resistant bacteria was not decreasing in chicken from these producers.</p>
<p>One sentence in the report was particularly eye opening. It said that the authors were not able to verify that the producers had voluntarily stopped using the fluoroquinolone antibiotics in 2002, <strong>because poultry producers are not required to report their use of drugs in food animals to regulatory agencies</strong>!!! Who knows what drugs the big poultry producers are using? It is a secret that only they know. This is another reason why organically raised chickens, turkeys, and eggs are a better choice than conventionally produced poultry and eggs. To read more &#8230; <a href="http://www.thepoultrysite.com/poultrynews/12297/drugresistant-campylobacter-persists-in-poultry">www.thepoultrysite.com/poultrynews/12297/drugresistant-campylobacter-persists-in-poultry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/08/06/the-importance-of-organic-less-chance-of-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chemical and Pesticide Corn &#8211; Affecting our Children&#8217;s Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/07/10/chemical-and-pesticide-corn-affecting-our-childrens-intelligence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/07/10/chemical-and-pesticide-corn-affecting-our-childrens-intelligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Myron Horst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesticides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In May 2007, a report was released showing a correlation between corn fertilizer and pesticide application and lasting impacts on children&#8217;s intelligence. The study was conducted in Indiana, a major corn producing state. The months of June through August have the highest levels of fertilizer and herbicide runoff from corn fields into surface water. Indiana [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May 2007, a report was released showing a correlation between corn fertilizer and pesticide application and lasting impacts on children&#8217;s intelligence. The study was conducted in Indiana, a major corn producing state. The months of June through August have the highest levels of fertilizer and herbicide runoff from corn fields into surface water. Indiana children conceived June through August have the lowest scores on math and language tests, according to a study by University of Indiana Medical researchers. High nitrate and atrazine levels are suspected of affecting the normal production of thyroid hormones. </p>
<p>The study was based on looking at test scores of more than 1.6 million Indiana students in grades 3 through 10. The result was consistent across races and genders. Children conceived when fertilizer and pesticide application was the highest turned in the lowest scores in math and language tests!</p>
<p>The researchers also looked at data from 27 million births from 1996 to 2002 and found that premature births were highest for the year in June conception and birth defects peaked for conceptions during the months of the highest corn chemical applications! To read more follow this link: <a href="http://www.newfarm.org/columns/research_paul/2007/0607/testscores.shtml">http://www.newfarm.org/columns/research_paul/2007/0607/testscores.shtml</a> or do a Google search.</p>
<p>This is sobering information. Corn is likely to have an impact on even more little children this year. Because of the high demand for corn created by ethanol fuel production, 14.5 million more acres of corn were planted this year in the US than the number of acres in corn last year. Ethanol fuel from corn is looking more and more like a very poor solution to our oil and fuel needs.</p>
<p>There is one more question that needs to be asked. If the small minute amount of chemical that runs off in a rain storm, and gets further diluted in a large amount of water in a river or underground stream, affects an unborn child because its mother drank the water, what about effects of eating the corn itself? There is a large concentration of chemicals that are sprayed directly on the plant and chemicals that are absorbed by the roots that becomes part of the corn itself. Logically thinking, it would seem that there is an even greater potential for the pesticides and other chemicals to affect everyone&#8217;s intelligence regardless of what month they were conceived because we directly eat the corn, drink soda made from corn syrup, eat beef or chicken raised on chemical corn, or consume any of the many other products made from corn. </p>
<p>Is organic really worth the extra money? Yes, it is! Do you really want to eat or drink something that has conventional chemical and pesticide corn in it, or chicken or beef that chemical and pesticide corn was fed to? It is not just an issue about ourselves and our own families, but when we consume products made with chemical corn, we are supporting a farm where the chemical runoff from the field the corn was raised in is affecting other innocent little children for the rest of their lives. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jehovahjirehfarm.com/articles/2007/07/10/chemical-and-pesticide-corn-affecting-our-childrens-intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

